I can't let it go. The premise of a supposed hoax doing a dry un with only one rehearsal take almost a year apart from the main events carries its own sort of implausibility. On what is presumed to be an otherwise empty 100 loud of 16mm film, left to be exposed for a few seconds of a test run in the 60s never intended for public consummation.
Because when you look at the filmmaking behavior we are supposed to swallow here. iI is very counterintuitive and bizarre. As I have touched on before.
The other thing it seems like some segments only just now have learned Patterson was out in the wilderness shooting a Bigfoot documentary. They are at least behaving like its new information but my memory is this has always been common knowledge.
However as I have said my issues with Capturing Bigfoot are not about the personalities of those involved in the original PGF footage and its history. Its all about this new reel and new footage and how it came into the public discussion. I feel it has not been properly explained and what has been explained begs questions that deserve clear answers.
.jpg)